For an optimization problem, we want to find an efficient way of calculating
- critical points
;
- interior extremum
(replace
with
, accordingly);
- boundary extremum
(replace
with
, accordingly).
For 1, the Newton’s method (and the variants) dominate in unconstrained case, while Sequential Quadratic Programming and Interior-Point methods are preferred in the constrained.
For 2, the Adaptive Trust-Region Methods remain most effective and widely used.
For 3, suggested SOTA approaches include augmented Lagrangian methods, where the trust-region framework is combined with a penalty term to enforce the boundary constraint, and Level Set methods (like stable homology).
In scenario 2, we are better to find the signature of quadratic form when
- Adaptively control step sizes in optimization algorithms;
- Gain a deeper understanding of the function’s curvature;
- Improve the robustness and convergence of the concerned optimization process.
This can be seen in theory of local maxima and local minima, at the foundation.